One of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in orthopaedics is hip replacement. However, this is not a once-in-a-life-time surgical intervention. It is normal for the patient to assume that the hip implant device will have to be replaced eventually after a few decades. That is because these devices are merely artificial compared to the real thing and can only mimic everything for too long. Inevitable wearing themselves out as time goes by, these devices of man-made material could not blend in with the internal organs for too long.
A lot of things can happen when a hip replacement device has already outgrown its most optimal state of performance. Common situations to expect would be the ball and socket implant to loosen themselves up or an infection to locally manifest around the area of the prosthetic. Other possible outcomes would be the hip device breaking into pieces as a result of wearing out and worse, the bones near the implant might be affected with damage as well. No one on their way to treatment would be very accepting of this experience. However, these are bound to happen and can harm the state and function of one’s hip joint which calls for a hip replacement to solve the problem. It is preferred though that this case applies only after more than twenty years have passed.
Revision surgeries, while serving a good cause, are undeniably riskier and more expensive than the initial hip replacement surgery. Along with this, recovery rate and the complication of performing the surgery is more stressful to imagine. Why? First, the procedure could cause excruciating pain to the patient and present a challenge to the surgeon if the tissue on the site is infected. Next, follow up replacement operations mostly occur at a time of older age, making the pain less tolerable and stress and anxiety less unavoidable. The patient by then might have also developed other diseases with age which can double the experience of pain and prevent the patient from taking pain relievers which pose as contraindications to the other illness.
Now that we know the risks and dangers of getting an untimely revision surgery, we learn that it is essential to use only a reliable brand and model of artificial hip implant. These well-working and reliable devices should also not be in the list of devices recalled by FDA such as Stryker hip replacements.
URL Reference: orthopedics.about.com/cs/hipreplacement/a/implantissues.htm
A lot of things can happen when a hip replacement device has already outgrown its most optimal state of performance. Common situations to expect would be the ball and socket implant to loosen themselves up or an infection to locally manifest around the area of the prosthetic. Other possible outcomes would be the hip device breaking into pieces as a result of wearing out and worse, the bones near the implant might be affected with damage as well. No one on their way to treatment would be very accepting of this experience. However, these are bound to happen and can harm the state and function of one’s hip joint which calls for a hip replacement to solve the problem. It is preferred though that this case applies only after more than twenty years have passed.
Revision surgeries, while serving a good cause, are undeniably riskier and more expensive than the initial hip replacement surgery. Along with this, recovery rate and the complication of performing the surgery is more stressful to imagine. Why? First, the procedure could cause excruciating pain to the patient and present a challenge to the surgeon if the tissue on the site is infected. Next, follow up replacement operations mostly occur at a time of older age, making the pain less tolerable and stress and anxiety less unavoidable. The patient by then might have also developed other diseases with age which can double the experience of pain and prevent the patient from taking pain relievers which pose as contraindications to the other illness.
Now that we know the risks and dangers of getting an untimely revision surgery, we learn that it is essential to use only a reliable brand and model of artificial hip implant. These well-working and reliable devices should also not be in the list of devices recalled by FDA such as Stryker hip replacements.
URL Reference: orthopedics.about.com/cs/hipreplacement/a/implantissues.htm
RSS Feed